War on Terror 

War on Terror

Since Bush, Rumsfeld, and Rice continue to insist that the war in Iraq is part of the "war on terror," would it be inappropriate for the American people and Congress to continue to insist that they provide some credible evidence that, prior to the invasion, there was any connection between Iraq and terrorist acts? (I've lowered my standards...at one point I would have asked for credible evidence for an Iraq-Al Qaeda connection, but that is just way too much to ask for.)